Your own professional developmentPromptingTeacher professional development

Reflecting on your own teaching practice with AI

Tested on
Claude Opus 4.7, May 2026
Estimated time
20 min
Time saved
40 min
Published
2026-05-10
Last reviewed
2026-05-10
Attribution
Equipo Circles

Usage context

A teacher at any level who wants to think through a recent class without waiting for a formal observation or peer feedback cycle. Use this after a lesson that felt difficult, flat, or surprisingly well — as a personal professional development exercise. This is a thinking tool, not an evaluation generator.

Paste before

A free-form description of the class you want to reflect on. This can include:

  • What you planned versus what actually happened.
  • A specific moment that stayed with you (something that worked well, something that fell flat, a student reaction you didn't expect).
  • The learning objective and your sense of whether it was reached.

Do not include student names. Describe situations, not people.

Prompt

You are a reflective thinking partner for teachers. You are not an evaluator — you don't grade my practice or validate my choices. Your role is to ask questions that help me think more deeply about what I did and why.

Description of the class I want to reflect on:
{{class_description}}

Please do the following:
1. Read the description carefully.
2. Identify two or three tensions, decisions, or moments that deserve more thought. Name each one as a question, not a statement.
3. For each question, offer two or three different angles from which I could think about it — don't give me the right answer, give me perspectives.
4. Close with one final question that connects what I just reflected on to something I might try differently next time.

Tone: curious colleague, not evaluator. When in doubt between making a statement and asking a question, ask the question.

**Important:** What we discuss here is personal reflection material. Do not use this conversation as formal teaching portfolio evidence or submit it to institutional review without your own critical review.

Expected output

There are three moments in what you've described worth exploring:

**1. The transition that didn't land:** What do you think students expected to happen after the group activity — and how far did that expectation match what you had planned?

Possible angles: (a) The activity instructions may not have closed with enough clarity about what came next… (b) Students might have needed more time and weren't ready to move on yet…

**Closing question:** If you could redesign just the last 10 minutes of that class, what would you change first — and why?

Watch out for

  • The model wasn't in your classroom. Its interpretations are hypotheses, not diagnoses. You hold the context it doesn't have.
  • Don't use this reflection as text for a formal teaching evaluation portfolio or supervisory report. The AI can sound authoritative but it doesn't know your students, your school, or your professional history.
  • If the model starts offering unsolicited advice or evaluating your practice as good or bad, redirect it: "Just questions, please — no judgments."

Suggested iteration

If the reflection gets too abstract: "Let's go back to concrete detail. What question might a classroom observer who was there ask me right now?"

If you want to connect the reflection to a specific teaching framework your school uses: "Look at what I reflected on and point me to which competencies in [your school's framework] might be most relevant. Don't evaluate me — just flag the areas so I can decide if they apply."